Data Reveals Deadly Guardrail New Flaws & Protection Systems

Executive Summary

Conventional roadside guardrails, while highly effective in saving the lives of occupants in cars and light trucks, present a critical and disproportionate lethal risk to motorcyclists. This report synthesizes statistical, biomechanical, and engineering data to demonstrate this systemic safety issue. The statistical data is unequivocal: motorcyclists, who constitute only a small fraction of the U.S. vehicle fleet, account for nearly half of all guardrail-related fatalities. The fatality risk for a motorcyclist in a guardrail collision is over 70 times greater than for a car occupant in a similar event, and this problem has been growing in severity.

The primary hazard is not the horizontal guardrail beam itself, but the unforgiving vertical posts and other protruding hardware that can cause catastrophic injuries, particularly to the thorax and head. Acknowledging this fundamental design flaw, international efforts, particularly in Europe, have led to the development of Motorcycle Protection Systems (MPS). These systems, often retrofitted to existing guardrails, shield the dangerous posts and offer a continuous sliding surface, proving their efficacy in crash tests and real-world scenarios.

Widespread adoption of these solutions has been limited, largely due to a lack of comprehensive, updated testing standards and the perceived high cost of a full-scale infrastructure overhaul. However, a strategic, data-driven approach focusing on high-risk “black spots” has been shown to be a cost-effective and pragmatic solution. This report recommends a phased strategy that includes immediate, targeted implementation of MPS at identified high-risk locations, a mid-term update of national crash testing standards to include motorcyclist crash dynamics, and a long-term goal of making motorcycle-friendly barriers a standard requirement wherever new guardrails are installed.

1. Introduction: The Guardrail Paradox

1.1. Statement of Purpose and Scope

This report provides a comprehensive, expert analysis of the lethal risks that conventional roadside guardrails pose to motorcyclists. The purpose is to move beyond anecdotal evidence and provide a data-backed understanding of the issue by synthesizing statistical, biomechanical, and engineering data. This analysis will draw upon a wide range of sources, including government studies from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), technical reports from research centers, and international academic and engineering literature. The scope is to establish the scale of the problem, identify the specific mechanisms of injury, evaluate current and alternative infrastructure designs, and propose a strategic framework for mitigation based on global best practices.

1.2. Overview of the Problem: A Critical and Diverging Safety Issue

The modern roadside guardrail represents a critical and diverging safety issue. For decades, it has served as a cornerstone of traffic safety, successfully saving the lives of occupants in cars and trucks by redirecting errant vehicles and preventing them from colliding with more rigid, fixed objects like bridge abutments or trees.¹ This success, however, has created a paradox: a device designed to save lives for one class of vehicle transforms into a uniquely lethal hazard for another. The design, which relies on strong, rigid vertical posts, is highly effective for heavy, enclosed vehicles. For an exposed motorcyclist, however, these same posts become unforgiving, concentrated points of impact that can lead to catastrophic injuries and death.¹ This fundamental design mismatch has become a growing concern as the population of motorcyclists has increased, creating an accelerating rate of preventable tragedies. The problem is not one of a failed technology, but of a technology that succeeded so well for its original purpose that its shortcomings for a different user group were initially overlooked. Consequently, the search for a solution is one of adaptation rather than replacement, requiring modifications that can enhance safety for motorcyclists without compromising the effectiveness of the barrier for other road users.

2. The Guardrail Fatality Crisis: A Statistical and Epidemiological Analysis

2.1. Disproportionate Fatality Risk: A Data-Driven Perspective

The statistical data on motorcycle-guardrail collisions reveals a disproportionate and alarming fatality risk. While motorcycles represent only 2% to 3% of the U.S. vehicle fleet, they account for a staggering 42% of all fatalities resulting from guardrail collisions.¹ This overrepresentation underscores a fundamental vulnerability. The fatality risk for a motorcyclist is dramatically higher than for other vehicle types. Data indicates that a motorcyclist’s risk of fatality is over 80 times greater than that of a car occupant in a similar collision.³ This extreme disparity highlights that the issue is not simply a matter of general roadside safety but a specific and urgent engineering problem related to guardrail design.

2.2. Guardrail vs. Other Fixed Objects: A Comparative Fatality Analysis

The lethality of a guardrail collision is demonstrably higher for motorcyclists than other common crash scenarios. A comparative fatality analysis shows that the risk of death for a motorcyclist in a collision with a guardrail is 12%.⁴ This is significantly higher than the fatality risk associated with a collision with a concrete barrier (8%) or a car (4.8%), which is only approximately one-third the risk of a guardrail collision.⁴ These statistics demonstrate that guardrails are not merely another fixed object; they are a uniquely lethal one for motorcyclists. This finding shifts the focus from general roadside hazard mitigation to a specific, high-priority intervention targeting the design and placement of guardrails.

2.3. Trends in Fatalities: The Rise of Motorcycle-Guardrail Crashes

The guardrail safety problem is not static; it is worsening. From 2000 to 2005, a period that saw a 7% to 8% annual increase in motorcycle registrations, the number of motorcyclists fatally injured in guardrail crashes rose by 73%.⁴ In contrast, fatalities for car occupants in similar collisions declined by 31% over the same period. This trend culminated in a critical statistical turning point in 2005, when for the first time, motorcycle fatalities (224) from guardrail collisions surpassed those of car occupants (171).¹ This accelerating rate of preventable deaths is a product of two converging factors: a growing population of motorcyclists and the inherent, unmitigated danger of existing infrastructure. This establishes that a policy of inaction will lead to a worsening crisis.

2.4. Table 1: Comparative Fatality Risk in Guardrail Collisions (2000-2005 U.S. Data)

The following table provides a clear, quantitative representation of the disproportionate risk faced by motorcyclists in guardrail collisions, using data from a NHTSA study conducted between 2000 and 2005.⁴

3. The Anatomy of a Collision: Injury Mechanisms and Crash Dynamics

3.1. Primary Injury Profiles: The Dominance of Thorax and Head Trauma

The patterns of fatal and severe injuries in guardrail collisions are not random. Research consistently indicates that the thorax and head have the highest incidence of injury, regardless of the barrier type.⁵ Motorcyclists involved in a crash with a roadside barrier are 2.15 times more likely to suffer a severe injury to the thoracic region compared to those in a crash that does not involve a barrier.⁶ A significant finding is that over two-thirds of motorcyclists fatally injured in a guardrail crash were wearing a helmet.⁴ This suggests that for guardrail collisions, the primary lethal force often bypasses the protection of the helmet, which is designed to prevent head impact trauma. Instead, the cause is frequently a devastating, high-energy impact to the body, particularly the chest and abdomen. The problem is therefore framed less as a failure of rider protective equipment and more as a fundamental flaw in infrastructure design.

3.2. Role of Barrier Components: The Posts as Primary Hazard

A body of research is conclusive on the fact that the vertical posts of a W-beam guardrail are the most significant danger to motorcyclists.¹ The horizontal W-beam itself presents a relatively smooth, redirective surface. In contrast, the rigid, vertical posts have narrow faces and sharp edges that concentrate the force of a collision onto the rider’s body, which is what leads to the severe injuries and fatalities. The literature describes these posts as “unforgiving to the tumbling cyclists”.¹ Eyewitness accounts and reports from first responders, such as a firefighter who describes having to “pulling body parts out of the guard rail” after a wreck, corroborate the catastrophic nature of these impacts.⁷ This finding is paramount for engineering solutions. It indicates that the problem is not the guardrail as a whole, but the components beneath the primary rail. Therefore, effective countermeasures must be specifically designed to shield these posts, which is the core principle of Motorcycle Protection Systems (MPS).

3.3. Crash Kinematics: Understanding the Upright, Sliding, and Ejected Impact Postures

A comprehensive understanding of collision dynamics requires analyzing the various postures a rider can assume upon impact. The upright crash mode, where the rider strikes the barrier while still seated on the motorcycle, is a significant factor in severe outcomes.⁵ In this scenario, the rider may be ejected over the barrier or scrape and tumble along the top of the rail, often impacting a vertical post in the process.⁵ Conversely, the sliding crash mode involves the rider separating from the motorcycle and sliding along the ground into the barrier.⁵ These differing impact mechanisms expose a critical gap in existing international standards, such as the European Standard EN 1317-8, which historically only addressed the sliding crash posture.⁵ A more complete approach to safety requires the development of new test protocols that account for all crash modes, particularly the upright posture, to ensure that protective measures are effective against all likely collision scenarios.

4. Roadside Infrastructure: Design and Performance

4.1. Conventional Barrier Systems: W-Beam and Wire-Rope

Conventional W-beam guardrails are the most prevalent type of roadside barrier and are overrepresented in fatal motorcycle crashes, likely due to their widespread use.¹⁰ The design, with standard heights typically ranging from 27.75 inches to 30 inches, is optimized for redirecting cars and light trucks.¹¹ Wire-rope barriers, while designed to offer a more gradual deceleration by deflecting vehicles, have also raised significant safety concerns among motorcyclists.³ Riders and some engineers fear their “cheese cutter” or “snagging” effect, which can lead to severe lacerations and catastrophic injuries.³ The consensus among safety advocates is that neither of these conventional barrier types, in their standard form, adequately addresses the unique risks faced by motorcyclists.

4.2. Rigid Barriers: Concrete and Jersey Barriers

Rigid concrete barriers, such as Jersey barriers, also present a complex set of risks for motorcyclists. Data from a multi-state study in North Carolina, Texas, and New Jersey showed that collisions with concrete barriers resulted in a slightly lower percentage of fatal or severe injuries (36.5%) compared to W-beam guardrails (40.1%).¹⁴ However, there was no statistically significant difference in the risk of severe injury between W-beam and concrete barriers for helmeted riders.¹⁴ A key risk with concrete barriers is that their rigidity can catapult a motorcyclist over the barrier and into the hazard it was installed to protect against, such as oncoming traffic in a median.⁸ This highlights that a simple substitution of barrier types is not a complete solution. The data demonstrates that no single standard, non-modified barrier type is inherently “motorcycle-friendly.” Any effective solution must involve a targeted redesign to mitigate the specific risks posed by each barrier type.

4.3. The Importance of Placement: The Clear Zone and Road Geometry

The placement of a guardrail is as critical to safety as its design. Research has shown that increasing the distance between the barrier and the edge of the road, creating a wider “clear zone,” can significantly reduce both crash and injury risk.³ Road geometry is also a major contributing factor, with small and medium radius curves identified as locations where motorcycle-to-barrier crashes are more likely to occur.¹ This demonstrates that the barrier itself is often the final, lethal object in a causal chain that may begin with an inappropriate roadway design. This understanding validates a site-specific, risk-based approach to mitigation. This approach, known as the “Black Spot” model, targets locations where a confluence of factors—such as tight curves and a lack of clear zone—creates a statistically high risk.

4.4. Table 2: Comparison of Conventional Barrier Types for Motorcyclist Safety

The following table provides a clear comparison of the most common barrier types, summarizing their design, primary injury mechanisms, and relative safety for motorcyclists.

5. Engineering and Design Solutions: Mitigation and Countermeasures

5.1. Motorcycle Protection Systems (MPS): Design, Function, and Efficacy

The most promising engineering solution is the retrofitting or installation of Motorcycle Protection Systems (MPS). These systems, which are often in the form of a steel, plastic, or mesh rail, are installed below the primary guardrail beam.³ Their primary functions are to shield the lethal vertical posts and provide a smooth, continuous sliding surface that prevents a motorcyclist from snagging or being cut.³ Test-approved MPS have been shown to save lives and reduce injuries.³ A significant step forward has been made with the “Motorcyclist Safety Barrier,” a protective plate below the main rail, which is now a “widely accepted and standardised” solution for sliding crashes.¹⁵

5.2. Alternative and Hybrid Barrier Systems

Beyond traditional MPS, other innovations include the development of two-beam guardrail systems to prevent post impacts ⁹ and the use of flexible or breakaway sign supports.¹⁸ The use of alternative materials, such as aluminum, may also provide long-term benefits. While aluminum railings may have a slightly higher initial cost than steel, they are more durable and have lower maintenance requirements, offering a more cost-effective option over their lifecycle by resisting rust and corrosion.¹⁹ This approach of evaluating new materials and designs based on full life-cycle cost rather than just initial purchase price is a critical consideration for infrastructure policy.

5.3. Life-Cycle Cost Analysis: A Framework for Strategic Investment

One of the key barriers to wider adoption of motorcycle-friendly barriers is the perceived high cost. Research shows that it is not economically beneficial to modify every guardrail nationwide.²¹ However, a comprehensive life-cycle cost analysis (LCCA) that considers not only construction and maintenance but also public costs—such as crash costs, traffic delays, and worker exposure risk—can reframe the conversation.²² This analysis demonstrates that targeted improvements at high-risk “black spots” are, in fact, highly cost-effective.²¹ For example, the Australian Government’s Black Spot Program provides funding for projects with a benefit-to-cost ratio greater than two.²³ This approach powerfully counters the argument that these safety measures are too expensive by demonstrating that a targeted, risk-based strategy can save lives and money simultaneously.

5.4. Table 3: Motorcycle Protection Systems (MPS) & Key Features

The following table synthesizes information on various MPS designs, providing a clear technical overview of the types of solutions available.

6. Policy and Implementation: A Global and National Perspective

6.1. The Regulatory Landscape: A Review of International and National Standards

The international regulatory landscape shows a clear divergence. While international bodies, particularly in Europe, have made progress in updating crash testing standards to include motorcyclist safety ⁵, the United States has yet to follow suit. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) does not currently advocate for the widespread use of motorcycle-friendly modifications on the National Highway System (NHS).¹¹ This regulatory lag is a significant factor hindering the adoption of proven safety technologies in the U.S. This provides a clear, actionable path forward: harmonizing domestic standards with international protocols would incentivize manufacturers to develop and test new, safer barrier designs.

6.2. The “Black Spot” Model: Targeting High-Risk Locations for Maximum Impact

The most successful and pragmatic approach to implementing motorcycle-friendly infrastructure has been the “Black Spot” program, which has been effectively used in Europe and Australia.²¹ This model involves identifying specific high-crash locations and dedicating funding to implement targeted safety improvements, including the installation of motorcycle-friendly barriers. This approach offers a powerful solution to the challenge of cost and scale. By prioritizing locations with a proven history of crashes, it ensures that limited resources are directed toward interventions with a high benefit-to-cost ratio. This circumvents the political and economic challenge of a full-scale infrastructure overhaul by demonstrating a high return on investment in a pilot program. The success of this model in countries like Spain, France, and Australia provides a powerful proof-of-concept for its adoption in other regions.

6.3. Case Studies: Global Adoption and Lessons Learned

Countries that have taken proactive steps to address this issue provide valuable case studies. Australia’s Victoria was the first jurisdiction to develop a “Making Roads Motorcycle Friendly” package, which has since been replicated in Western Australia, New Zealand, and 12 other countries.¹⁸ Spain, in particular, has been lauded for developing and implementing a standard for guardrails that specifically accounts for vulnerable road users.²⁷ These examples show that effective implementation requires a multi-faceted approach that includes not just engineering solutions but also funding mechanisms like the “Black Spot” program and a willingness to update standards based on data. The lessons learned from these successes are critical for guiding policy in other regions facing similar challenges.

6.4. The Role of Rider Education and Technology

While infrastructure modifications are essential, they are not the only solution. Rider behavior is a significant factor in fatal crashes, with speeding, alcohol, and drugs playing a role in more than half of fatal barrier crashes in Australia and New Zealand.¹⁰ The importance of rider education, proper training, and the adoption of personal safety technologies cannot be overstated.¹ The widespread adoption of technologies like Antilock Braking Systems (ABS), which can reduce fatal crash rates by 22% ³¹, and airbag jackets ³², which can reduce transferred energy by over 90% ³², must be pursued as a complementary strategy to infrastructure improvements.

7. Conclusion and Recommendations

7.1. Synthesis of Findings

The analysis in this report demonstrates that conventional steel guardrails pose a disproportionate and lethal risk to motorcyclists. This risk is not a minor side effect but a critical and growing problem with a clear statistical and biomechanical basis. The primary mechanism of injury is not the guardrail beam itself, but the lethal vertical posts and other protruding hardware. While no single barrier type is entirely safe for motorcyclists in its standard form, proven engineering countermeasures, particularly Motorcycle Protection Systems (MPS), exist and are highly effective in mitigating these specific dangers. The widespread adoption of these solutions has been hampered by regulatory inertia and the perceived high cost of implementation. However, a strategic, data-driven approach focusing on high-risk locations has been shown to be a pragmatic and cost-effective path forward.

7.2. Actionable Recommendations for a Path Forward

Based on the evidence and global best practices, the following actionable recommendations are proposed:

• Immediate Action: Implement a “Black Spot” Program. The most immediate and cost-effective way to save lives is to establish a pilot program that identifies and retrofits high-risk “black spots” on the roadway network. This program should prioritize locations with a high frequency of motorcycle-to-barrier crashes, such as rural and urban curves, interchanges, and access roads. Funding should be directed toward installing test-approved Motorcycle Protection Systems (MPS) that shield the guardrail posts.
• Mid-Term Strategy: Update Crash Testing Standards. National regulatory bodies, such as the FHWA and NHTSA, should update crash testing standards to include protocols for motorcyclist impacts. These new protocols must account for all crash postures, particularly the upright position, to incentivize manufacturers to design and test safer barrier systems that address the full spectrum of injury mechanisms.
• Long-Term Goal: Establish Standardized Guidelines. The ultimate objective should be to establish clear national guidelines for the design and installation of motorcycle-friendly barriers. This would make the use of MPS a standard requirement wherever new guardrails are installed, ensuring that future infrastructure projects are designed with the safety of all road users in mind.

7.3. Areas for Future Research

While a clear path forward exists, additional research is required to optimize implementation. There is a need for more detailed U.S.-specific data on the effectiveness and long-term performance of various MPS systems in diverse climates and crash scenarios. Furthermore, the development of a publicly available, user-friendly life-cycle cost analysis (LCCA) tool, similar to the CalBarrier software, would empower state and local transportation agencies to more accurately compute the full spectrum of crash and maintenance costs, thereby providing a robust economic justification for strategic investment in motorcycle safety infrastructure.

Sources

1. Motorcycle Crash Analysis RFP NUMBER: 2008-17 NJDOT RES – NJ.gov, accessed on August 20, 2025, https://www.nj.gov/transportation/business/research/pdf/rowanqrep/rowan_08_q2_motorcycle.pdf
2. Motorcycle safety – Wikipedia, accessed on August 20, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motorcycle_safety
3. Chapter 8. Barriers and motorcyclists – FEMA, accessed on August 20, 2025, https://www.femamotorcycling.eu/safer-roads-for-motorcycles/safer-roads-chapter-8/
4. 1 THE RISK OF FATALITY IN MOTORCYCLE CRASHES WITH ROADSIDE BARRIERS Hampton C. Gabler Virginia Tech United States Paper – Research, accessed on August 20, 2025, https://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/pdf/ESV/Proceedings/20/07-0474-O.pdf
5. Motorcyclist Impacts into Roadside Barriers – Skilled Motorcyclist …, accessed on August 20, 2025, https://smarter-usa.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/2013-Motorcycliist-Impacts-into-roadside-Barriers-Is-the-European-Crash-Test-Standard-Comprehansive-Enough.pdf
6. Influence of Road Safety Barriers on the Severity of Motorcyclist Injuries in Horizontal Curves, accessed on August 20, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/22/14790
7. Definitely would not want to be riding with that group : r/motorcycles – Reddit, accessed on August 20, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/motorcycles/comments/1mnudtl/definitely_would_not_want_to_be_riding_with_that/
8. Motorcycle Impacts to Roadside Barriers – Real World Accident Studies, Crash Tests and Simulations Carried Out in Germany and – Research, accessed on August 20, 2025, https://www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/pdf/ESV/Proceedings/19/05-0095-O.pdf
9. MOTORCYCLE IMPACTS WITH GUARDRAILS – Transportation Research Board, accessed on August 20, 2025, https://onlinepubs.trb.org/Onlinepubs/trcircular/341/341-003.pdf
10. MOTORCYCLE CRASHES INTO ROADSIDE BARRIERS STAGE 1: CRASH CHARACTERISTICS AND CAUSAL FACTORS – UNSW Sydney, accessed on August 20, 2025, https://www.unsw.edu.au/content/dam/pdfs/science/aviation/research-reports/2022-02-research/2022-01-Motorcycle-into-Barrier-Stage1_report.pdf
11. Frequently Asked Questions: Barriers, Terminals, Transitions, Attenuators, and Bridge Railings | FHWA, accessed on August 20, 2025, https://highways.dot.gov/safety/rwd/reduce-crash-severity/frequently-asked-questions-barriers-terminals-transitions-attenuators-and
12. Traffic barrier – TB – wsdot – | WA.gov, accessed on August 20, 2025, https://wsdot.wa.gov/engineering-standards/all-manuals-and-standards/plan-sheet-library/traffic-barrier-tb
13. Motorcyclists and Wire Rope Barriers – AASHTO Innovation Initiative, accessed on August 20, 2025, https://aii.transportation.org/Documents/NewZealandMotorcycleReport-November2006.pdf
14. THE EFFECT OF BARRIER TYPE ON INJURY SEVERITY IN MOTORCYCLE TO BARRIER COLLISIONS IN NORTH CAROLINA, TEXAS, AND NEW JERSEY – Skilled Motorcyclist Association, accessed on August 20, 2025, https://smarter-usa.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/4.-the-effect-of-barrier-type-on-injury-severity-in-motorcycle-to-barrier-collisions-in-north-carolina-texas-and-new-jersey-2010.pdf
15. Overview of the Patents and Patent Applications on Upper Guardrail Protection Systems for Motorcyclists – MDPI, accessed on August 20, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2412-3811/10/7/165
16. NJDOT Bureau of Research – NJ.gov, accessed on August 20, 2025, https://www.nj.gov/transportation/business/research/pdf/rowanqrep/rowan_09_q1_motorcycle.pdf
17. Exploring The Different Types of Road Safety Barriers – Headsup B2B, accessed on August 20, 2025, https://www.headsupb2b.com/blog/exploring-the-different-types-of-road-safety-barriers
18. Making Roads Motorcycle Friendly – Victorian Government, accessed on August 20, 2025, https://www.vic.gov.au/sites/default/files/2024-07/Making-roads-motorcycle-friendly.pdf
19. The Cost Effectiveness of Aluminum Railings: Key Advantages Explained, accessed on August 20, 2025, https://www.railworks.net/deck-railing/the-cost-effectiveness-of-aluminum-railings-key-advantages-explained/
20. Deck Railing – A Total Rip-off? : r/Homebuilding – Reddit, accessed on August 20, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/Homebuilding/comments/1at2ylo/deck_railing_a_total_ripoff/
21. Motorcycle-Guardrail Crashes: How can the risk of severe injury and fatality be reduced?, accessed on August 20, 2025, https://www.globalhighways.com/feature/motorcycle-guardrail-crashes-how-can-risk-severe-injury-and-fatality-be-reduced
22. Cost-Benefit Analysis for Concrete vs. Metal Guardrails and Wood vs …, accessed on August 20, 2025, https://dot.ca.gov/-/media/dot-media/programs/research-innovation-system-information/documents/final-reports/final-report-task-3848-a11y.pdf
23. Australian Government Black Spot Program | Transport for NSW, accessed on August 20, 2025, https://www.transport.nsw.gov.au/operations/roads-and-waterways/business-and-industry/partners-and-suppliers/local-government-15
24. Motorcycle Protection Barriers – Barrier Designs, accessed on August 20, 2025, https://barrierdesigns.com.au/motorcycle-protection-barriers/
25. nchrp 22-60 – Transportation Research Board, accessed on August 20, 2025, https://apps.trb.org/cmsfeed/TRBNetProjectDisplay.asp?ProjectID=5536
26. Motorcycles – Road Safety Observatory – RoSPA, accessed on August 20, 2025, https://www.rospa.com/siteassets/images/road-safety/road-safety-projects/road-safety-observatory/riders-motorcycles.pdf
27. EU Parliament hosts exhibition of rider friendly guardrails – MAG Ireland, accessed on August 20, 2025, https://www.magireland.org/2012/campaigns/barriers/eu-exhibition-of-rider-friendly-guardrails/
28. Black Spots Program, accessed on August 20, 2025, https://investment.infrastructure.gov.au/about/local-initiatives/black-spots-program
29. 2023 SafeTREC Traffic Safety Facts: Motorcycle Safety | Safe Transportation Research and Education Center, accessed on August 20, 2025, https://safetrec.berkeley.edu/2023-safetrec-traffic-safety-facts-motorcycle-safety
30. Fatality Facts 2023: Motorcycles and ATVs – IIHS, accessed on August 20, 2025, https://www.iihs.org/research-areas/fatality-statistics/detail/motorcycles-and-atvs
31. Motorcycles – IIHS, accessed on August 20, 2025, https://www.iihs.org/research-areas/motorcycles
32. 4 High-Tech Ways To Make Your Motorcycle Ride Safer, accessed on August 20, 2025, https://www.lowmanlawfirm.com/blog/4-high-tech-ways-to-make-your-motorcycle-ride-safer

Our Social Media Handles

• Instagram : LivingWithGravity
• Medium : Akash Dolas
• YouTube Channel : Gear and Shutter