Tesla Cybertruck

Elon Musk’s statement about the safety of the Tesla Cybertruck raises a complex mix of issues, combining the aspects of vehicle design, occupant safety, pedestrian safety, and industry regulations.

Musk’s claim that the Cybertruck will be “much safer per mile” than other trucks in its class is bold, especially given the ongoing concerns about its occupant safety. The lack of visible deformation in the truck’s structure during a head-on collision at 35 MPH is particularly worrisome, as it suggests a potential lack of crumple zones. Crumple zones are crucial in modern vehicle design as they absorb impact forces during a collision, thereby reducing the risk of injury to occupants.

Elon Musk

Key Analysis

The key points in analyzing Elon Musk’s statement about the safety of the Tesla Cybertruck, along with the associated concerns and studies, can be summarized as follows:

  • Occupant Safety Concerns: The Cybertruck’s lack of visible deformation in crash tests raises concerns about its occupant safety. In conventional vehicle design, crumple zones are critical for absorbing impact forces to protect occupants. The Cybertruck’s seemingly rigid structure during a head-on collision suggests it might not have effective crumple zones, potentially increasing the risk of injury to passengers.
  • Impact Force Transmission: The movement of the truck’s rear wheel during collision tests indicates that the impact force may be transmitted through the vehicle. This could result in a higher risk of injury, as the force of the collision might be less absorbed by the vehicle’s structure and more directly felt by its occupants.
  • Pedestrian Safety Risks: The design of the Cybertruck, particularly its height and front-end profile, poses additional risks to pedestrian safety. The IIHS study highlights that trucks with hood heights over 40 inches are significantly more dangerous to pedestrians. Despite the Cybertruck’s sloped front-end, its likely height over 40 inches places it in a higher risk category for pedestrian impacts.
  • Balance Between Vehicle and Pedestrian Safety: Musk’s claims of the Cybertruck’s safety need to be balanced between ensuring occupant safety and minimizing harm to pedestrians. While Tesla’s suite of safety software may contribute to overall safety, the physical design characteristics of the Cybertruck are crucial factors in determining its safety performance in real-world scenarios.
  • Regulatory Compliance and Design Challenges: Cybertruck’s design faces challenges in meeting specific safety standards, particularly in Europe. European regulations require rounded corners on external projections to protect pedestrians in case of an impact clash with the Cybertruck’s design. This highlights a need for Tesla to adapt either its production methods or vehicle design to meet different international safety standards.
  • Tesla’s Safety Claims and Data Transparency: While Tesla has a history of emphasizing the safety of its vehicles, the specific case of the Cybertruck requires transparent and comprehensive testing data to substantiate safety claims. This is especially important given the unique design elements of the Cybertruck and the concerns raised.

Impact on Cybertruck Enthusiasts

The various discussions and concerns surrounding the safety of Tesla’s Cybertruck could have a multifaceted impact on Cybertruck enthusiasts:

  • Increased Scrutiny and Expectations: Enthusiasts may become more vigilant in their scrutiny of the Cybertruck, particularly regarding its safety features and performance in crash tests. They might demand more transparency and detailed information from Tesla to address the safety concerns raised.
  • Heightened Anticipation for Innovations: The emphasis on safety could heighten anticipation among enthusiasts for Tesla’s innovative approaches to addressing these concerns. This could include interest in how Tesla might adapt the Cybertruck’s design to improve occupant and pedestrian safety while maintaining its unique aesthetic.
  • Concerns Over Regulatory Compliance: Enthusiasts in regions with strict safety regulations, like Europe, may become concerned about the Cybertruck’s ability to meet these standards, potentially affecting its availability in these markets.
  • Reassurance from Safety Features: For some enthusiasts, Tesla’s reputation for integrating advanced safety technologies and features in its vehicles might provide reassurance. They might trust that the company will address these safety issues effectively before the Cybertruck’s release.
  • Impact on Purchase Decisions: The ongoing safety discussions might influence enthusiasts’ purchase decisions. While some might adopt a wait-and-see approach until more data is available, others might remain confident in Tesla’s ability to deliver a safe vehicle.
  • Community Discussions and Advocacy: The Cybertruck enthusiast community might become more active in discussing these safety issues on various platforms. They could advocate for specific safety features or design changes, influencing Tesla’s decisions.
  • Scepticism and Critical Analysis: Some enthusiasts might become more sceptical and critically analyze the information released by Tesla, especially given the mixed responses to the Cybertruck’s safety features.

Occupant Safety

The observed movement of the truck’s rear wheel during collision tests is also concerning. This could indicate that the force of impact is being transmitted through the vehicle, potentially affecting occupant safety. Musk’s argument about the low centre of gravity preventing rollovers is valid, but it addresses only one aspect of vehicle safety.

Regarding pedestrian safety, the Cybertruck’s design could pose additional risks. The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety’s study highlighting the increased danger to pedestrians from trucks with higher hood heights is particularly relevant. The Cybertruck’s front end, while sloped, is likely higher than 40 inches, placing it in a riskier category for pedestrian impacts. This is compounded by the vehicle’s weight and acceleration capabilities, common characteristics of electric vehicles.

Pedestrian Safety

Tesla’s claims about the Cybertruck’s safety need to be backed by comprehensive testing and data. While Tesla has historically emphasized the safety of its vehicles, the specific design elements of the Cybertruck present unique challenges that must be addressed to ensure both occupant and pedestrian safety.

Furthermore, Tesla’s approach to vehicle production and design, as highlighted by the challenges of meeting European safety standards, underscores the need for innovation in ensuring safety compliance across different markets. The European requirements for rounded corners on external projections, aimed at reducing pedestrian injuries, conflict with Cybertruck’s design, indicating a need for Tesla to adapt its production methods or vehicle design to meet these regulations.

Crash Test Analysis


While Tesla’s ambition to improve vehicle safety through engineering is commendable, the Cybertruck’s unique design presents specific challenges that need to be thoroughly addressed and tested to ensure the safety of both its occupants and pedestrians.

This analysis delves into Elon Musk’s claims regarding the safety of Tesla’s Cybertruck, juxtaposing these assertions against concerns about its occupant and pedestrian safety. It highlights the absence of visible deformation in crash tests, suggesting a lack of crumple zones, and discusses the potential transmission of impact forces to passengers. The piece also examines the Cybertruck’s design in relation to pedestrian safety risks, especially considering its height and the findings of the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety study. Additionally, it addresses the challenges in meeting international safety standards and the necessity for Tesla to provide comprehensive testing data to validate its safety claims.

To ensure the safety and compliance of Tesla’s Cybertruck, it is crucial for the company to conduct extensive testing and provide detailed data on both occupant and pedestrian safety. Additionally, Tesla should consider adapting the Cybertruck’s design to meet international safety standards, especially in regions with specific regulations like Europe. Stakeholders, including potential customers, regulators, and safety advocates, are encouraged to closely monitor Tesla’s progress and demand transparency in safety testing results. This will help ensure that the Cybertruck not only meets but exceeds safety expectations, aligning with Tesla’s commitment to innovative and safe vehicle design.


0 0 votes
Article Rating
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments